What are secondary markets, and why do they matter?
When we talk about shares changing hands, most people think of the stock market. But what about before companies go public?
Manage your equity and shareholders
Share schemes & options
Fundraising
Equity management
Start a business
Company valuations
Launch funds, evalute deals & invest
Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV)
Manage your portfolio
Model future scenarios
Powerful tools and five-star support
Employee share schemes
Predictable pricing and no hidden charges
For startups
For scaleups & SMEs
For larger companies
Ideas, insight and tools to help you grow
Table of Contents
In simple terms, fair value is what something would sell for in a fair, well-informed deal today.
Accounting standards define it more precisely. Under IFRS 13, it’s:
The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The key points:
FRS 102’s Section 2A mirrors this definition. Think of it as an “exit price” under normal market conditions – not a distressed sale, and not the number you hope for.
Under IFRS 2 and FRS 102 (UK GAAP) section 26, all share-based compensation must be recognised as an expense. The fair value of the equity instruments granted must be determined on the grant date.
This involves estimating the value of shares or options given to employees or suppliers, taking into account market conditions attached to those awards.
These differences mean UK companies need to know which framework applies when accounting for equity compensation.
Although related, fair value and market value are not the same:
Fair value may differ from market value when the market is illiquid or when the asset is not traded on an open market. A private company’s shares illustrate this distinction.
Without active markets, private companies must rely on valuation techniques and professional judgment to estimate fair value. Independent third-party input is often required.
Typical scenarios include:
These valuations typically use Level 3 inputs under IFRS 13 – *unobservable assumptions such as management forecasts and internal metrics.
*Unobservable assumptions, in the context of fair value measurement, refer to inputs used in valuation techniques that are not directly observable in the market.
Public companies benefit from active markets, making observable data more accessible.
IFRS 13 introduces a three-level fair value hierarchy:
Most listed companies rely on Level 1 and 2 inputs. However, level 3 models may still be necessary for unlisted subsidiaries, bespoke derivatives, or during *market dislocations.
*Market dislocation refers to a situation where asset prices significantly deviate from their fair or intrinsic value due to abnormal market conditions.
Fair value isn’t just an accounting box-tick; it impacts:
Get it wrong, and you risk misstated accounts, audit challenges, or even employee disputes.
There is no single formula. Fair value depends on the asset, data availability, and business maturity.
Here are the main methods used:
The market approach estimates fair value based on prices and other relevant information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or businesses.
This method is most effective when you have reliable, recent, comparable data.
Example: A SaaS firm applies a 5x revenue multiple from similar AIM-listed peers to its £2m ARR, yielding a £10m estimated value, subject to adjustments.
Common uses:
Limitations: Not suitable where markets are illiquid or comparables lack relevance.
The income approach estimates fair value based on the present value of expected future economic benefits, typically cash flows. The most common technique is the discounted cash flow (DCF) model.
This involves forecasting future cash flows and discounting them back to their present value using a discount rate that reflects the risk associated with those cash flows (such as the company’s cost of capital).
Example: An early-stage business projects five years of EBITDA, adds a terminal value, and discounts all cash flows at 15% to arrive at today’s value.
This method is often applied where:
This method depends on credible assumptions about growth, margins, and discount rates.
The cost approach estimates fair value based on the cost to replace or reproduce the asset, minus depreciation and obsolescence.
This method is most appropriate for tangible assets with limited earnings potential – for example, equipment, property, or infrastructure.
Example: An asset-heavy firm values its machinery at the current replacement cost of each asset today, then deducts depreciation based on age and condition.
Although rarely used for valuing equity or intangibles, the cost approach may be relevant when:
In practice, valuations – particularly for private company shares or share-based payments – often blend methods to mitigate the weaknesses of any single method. This combined approach helps ensure reasonableness, defensibility and compliance with accounting standards.
Some assets, like employee share options, need a specialist approach. One of the most widely used for IFRS 2 reporting is the Black-Scholes model.
It calculates the fair value of an option at the grant date – the figure you’ll expense over the vesting period.
Black-Scholes takes into account:
It produces an estimate of what the option is worth today – i.e. its fair value under IFRS 2. For many UK companies, using Black-Scholes ensures the valuation is robust, defensible, and audit-ready.
This is the method used in Vestd’s IFRS 2-compliant share-based payment reports.
Try it yourself using our Black-Scholes calculator.
Valuations aren’t just about the numbers – they reflect judgment calls. Key influences include:
For private companies, HMRC typically allows discounts for lack of control ot marketability, especially when valuing minority shareholdings or EMI options.
Fair value is the estimated price in a fair deal between informed, willing parties. It’s not the same as market value, which is the actual price in a real-world trade.
For private companies, fair value often depends on Level 3 inputs and professional judgement. Market, income and cost-based approaches help determine a fair value range.
Share-based payment accounting under IFRS 2 and FRS 102 hinges on fair value at grant date.
And finally, correct fair value measurement supports accurate financial reporting, tax compliance and investor confidence.
When in doubt, seek out qualified valuation specialists.
Fair value isn’t just about compliance – it’s about making decisions you can defend. Whether you’re issuing options, preparing for audit, or raising a round, knowing the fair value matters.
The right approach to valuation depends on your stage, structure, and reporting obligations.
Share schemes, investor expectations, and tax outcomes all intersect at the point of a valuation. Getting it wrong can be costly, but getting it right builds trust, clarity and long-term alignment.
We’ve made IFRS 2 reporting simpler, combining robust methods with reliable tech and expert support.
If you’re looking for support with your share-based payment accounting, book a free, no-obligation consultation.
When we talk about shares changing hands, most people think of the stock market. But what about before companies go public?
Last updated: 19 April 2024 You're eager to implement an employee share scheme, and that's fantastic news! But are your employees on board with the...
Company valuations often make headlines - especially when businesses achieve multi-billion-pound valuations without turning a profit. But how exactly...