Skip to the main content.
The sharetech platform

Manage your equity and shareholders

Share schemes & options icon

Share schemes & options

Give key people some skin in the game

Equity management icon

Equity management

Powerful tools and automations

The sharetech platform

Launch funds, evalute deals & invest

SPV icon

Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV)

Create a syndicate or fund

Manage icon

Manage your portfolio

Add and monitor your investments

The sharetech platform

Predictable pricing and no hidden charges

Startups icon
SME icon

For scaleups & SMEs

Build and retain a winning team

Enterprise icon

For larger companies

Streamline equity management

The sharetech platform

Ideas, insight and tools to help you grow

Learn icon

3 min read

Positioning vs. messaging: how to stop mixing them up

Positioning vs. messaging: how to stop mixing them up
Positioning vs. messaging: how to stop mixing them up
6:26

Most companies don’t struggle because they lack ideas, but because their ideas are blurry.

They tweak website copy, rewrite taglines, refresh tone of voice and launch new campaigns, and yet nothing really clicks. Marketing feels noisy and sales conversations drift. The brand sounds different every quarter.

In almost every case, the root cause is the same: positioning and messaging are being treated as the same thing.

However, they’re not, and when you mix them up, you get weak marketing and poor strategic decisions.

This article explains the difference, shows how positioning and messaging should work together, and explains why clarity shapes culture, focus, and how customers understand your value.

If your marketing feels busy but ineffective, the problem is usually confusion between strategy and expression.

The core problem: talking before deciding

Most companies start with messaging because it feels productive. Writing copy looks like progress, while positioning feels abstract, slow, and harder to agree on.

So founders jump straight to execution questions:

  • What should the homepage headline be?
  • How should we sound? 
  • Do we need a new tagline?

These are all expression problems. Without prior strategic decisions, they become guesswork.

The result is often lots of activity with little traction, with constant rewrites that create no lasting improvement, and teams disagreeing about tone because they haven’t first of all agreed on meaning. 

This pattern is well documented. Brand strategy research consistently shows that clarity of positioning precedes effective communication, not the other way around.

“Positioning is not equivalent to messaging. It isn't a tagline. It's not your brand story, nor is it your vision or your ‘why’.” - April Dunford 

Messaging done before positioning creates motion, not momentum.

What is positioning? 

Positioning is the set of strategic decisions that anchor everything else.

At a minimum, positioning answers three questions:

  • Who is this for? A clearly defined audience with shared needs. 
  • What problem do we solve? The real pain or job-to-be-done, not a list of features.
  • Why are we different? A meaningful distinction that customers actually care about.

Strong positioning creates constraints. It makes some opportunities irrelevant and some ideas obviously wrong. 

Research from Harvard Business School shows that companies with clear strategic focus outperform those that try to appeal broadly across segments. 

Positioning is a set of deliberate trade-offs that define where your company does, and does not compete.

What is messaging?

Messaging is how positioning shows up in the real world.

It includes:

  • The words you use
  • The tone and voice
  • The stories and examples you lead with
  • How you explain value in different contexts

Messaging should adapt by channel, audience, and moment. Positioning should not.

This distinction matters because many teams try to fix strategic ambiguity with cosmetic changes such as new copy, as well as sharper language and terminology. 

Messaging can only ever express what already exists underneath. If the positioning is vague, the messaging will simply be a more polished version of that vagueness.

Messaging cannot replace strategic clarity.

How positioning and messaging should work together 

When positioning is clear, messaging becomes easier and more consistent.

Teams know:

  • What to emphasise
  • What to ignore
  • What not to say, even if it sounds appealing

This alignment reduces internal friction. Marketing, sales, product and leadership stop pulling in different directions.

Brand consistency studies show that companies with strong internal alignment are significantly more likely to achieve above-average growth (Marq brand consistency report).  

Clear positioning makes good messaging much easier.  

Examples of strong alignment

It’s easy to spot when positioning and messaging are pulling in the same direction. These examples show how clarity at the strategic level creates consistency, trust, and momentum in the market.

For example, Monzo’s positioning is built around transparency, simplicity, and user empowerment in a sector known for complexity.

You see that positioning expressed through:

  • Plain-English explanations
  • Open communication about outages and decisions
  • A human, conversational tone

These messaging choices work because they reinforce a clear strategic stance, as outlined on their blog

When positioning is clear, even simple language becomes a competitive advantage.

monzo example

Patagonia’s positioning prioritises environmental responsibility over growth-at-all-costs.

That’s why campaigns like “Don’t Buy This Jacket” made sense. They were aligned with long-term commitments, not short-term attention (Patagonia mission statement. 

Without that positioning, the same messaging would have looked performative.

Slack positions itself around reducing friction in how teams communicate.

Its messaging reflects this through:

  • Friendly, informal tone
  • Emphasis on ease and flow, not power or control
  • Focus on removing busywork (Slack brand guidelines

Consistent messaging flows naturally when the value proposition is sharply defined.

Common positioning mistakes

Most positioning mistakes repeat for predictable reasons.

  • Chasing trends. Borrowing fashionable language (‘AI-powered’ etc) without real differentiation leads to sameness, not relevance. 
  • Slogan-driven strategy. Letting a tagline stand in for hard decisions. A slogan can summarise positioning, but it cannot create it.
  • Changing tone instead of revisiting strategy. Calls to sound bolder or more confident usually mask unresolved strategic disagreement.
  • Treating messaging as a quick fix. Rewriting copy when results dip instead of questioning assumptions about audience and value.

Summary

Positioning defines what you stand for, and messaging determines how clearly that comes across.

Mix them up, and you’ll waste time polishing words without sharpening meaning.

Get them right, and everything else becomes  easier.

If you’re a founder or leadership team:

  • Write down your positioning in plain English
  • Stress-test it against real alternatives
  • Then revisit messaging with confidence and intent

The goal is to be unmistakably clear. Decide what you stand for first and the right words will follow.



Who should write LinkedIn posts? You or the marketing team?

Who should write LinkedIn posts? You or the marketing team?

You’ve got an idea for a LinkedIn post, maybe a thought-provoking take, company update, or personal lesson.

Read More
Why great messaging begins with sharp positioning

Why great messaging begins with sharp positioning

Many founders start by listing product features without explaining why it matters. That misses the point entirely.

Read More
How startups can succeed in crowded markets

How startups can succeed in crowded markets

Startups often think crowded markets are unwinnable. If there are already ten competitors, how could you possibly break through?

Read More