Who should write LinkedIn posts? You or the marketing team?
You’ve got an idea for a LinkedIn post, maybe a thought-provoking take, company update, or personal lesson.
Manage your equity and shareholders
Share schemes & options
Equity management
Migrate to Vestd
Company valuations
Fundraising
Launch funds, evalute deals & invest
Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV)
Manage your portfolio
Model future scenarios
Powerful tools and five-star support
Employee share schemes
Predictable pricing and no hidden charges
For startups
For scaleups & SMEs
For larger companies
Ideas, insight and tools to help you grow
Most companies don’t struggle because they lack ideas, but because their ideas are blurry.
They tweak website copy, rewrite taglines, refresh tone of voice and launch new campaigns, and yet nothing really clicks. Marketing feels noisy and sales conversations drift. The brand sounds different every quarter.
In almost every case, the root cause is the same: positioning and messaging are being treated as the same thing.
However, they’re not, and when you mix them up, you get weak marketing and poor strategic decisions.
This article explains the difference, shows how positioning and messaging should work together, and explains why clarity shapes culture, focus, and how customers understand your value.
If your marketing feels busy but ineffective, the problem is usually confusion between strategy and expression.
Most companies start with messaging because it feels productive. Writing copy looks like progress, while positioning feels abstract, slow, and harder to agree on.
So founders jump straight to execution questions:
These are all expression problems. Without prior strategic decisions, they become guesswork.
The result is often lots of activity with little traction, with constant rewrites that create no lasting improvement, and teams disagreeing about tone because they haven’t first of all agreed on meaning.
This pattern is well documented. Brand strategy research consistently shows that clarity of positioning precedes effective communication, not the other way around.
“Positioning is not equivalent to messaging. It isn't a tagline. It's not your brand story, nor is it your vision or your ‘why’.” - April Dunford
Messaging done before positioning creates motion, not momentum.
Positioning is the set of strategic decisions that anchor everything else.
At a minimum, positioning answers three questions:
Strong positioning creates constraints. It makes some opportunities irrelevant and some ideas obviously wrong.
Research from Harvard Business School shows that companies with clear strategic focus outperform those that try to appeal broadly across segments.
Positioning is a set of deliberate trade-offs that define where your company does, and does not compete.
Messaging is how positioning shows up in the real world.
It includes:
Messaging should adapt by channel, audience, and moment. Positioning should not.
This distinction matters because many teams try to fix strategic ambiguity with cosmetic changes such as new copy, as well as sharper language and terminology.
Messaging can only ever express what already exists underneath. If the positioning is vague, the messaging will simply be a more polished version of that vagueness.
Messaging cannot replace strategic clarity.
When positioning is clear, messaging becomes easier and more consistent.
Teams know:
This alignment reduces internal friction. Marketing, sales, product and leadership stop pulling in different directions.
Brand consistency studies show that companies with strong internal alignment are significantly more likely to achieve above-average growth (Marq brand consistency report).
Clear positioning makes good messaging much easier.
It’s easy to spot when positioning and messaging are pulling in the same direction. These examples show how clarity at the strategic level creates consistency, trust, and momentum in the market.
For example, Monzo’s positioning is built around transparency, simplicity, and user empowerment in a sector known for complexity.
You see that positioning expressed through:
These messaging choices work because they reinforce a clear strategic stance, as outlined on their blog.
When positioning is clear, even simple language becomes a competitive advantage.

Patagonia’s positioning prioritises environmental responsibility over growth-at-all-costs.
That’s why campaigns like “Don’t Buy This Jacket” made sense. They were aligned with long-term commitments, not short-term attention (Patagonia mission statement.
Without that positioning, the same messaging would have looked performative.
Slack positions itself around reducing friction in how teams communicate.
Its messaging reflects this through:
Consistent messaging flows naturally when the value proposition is sharply defined.
Most positioning mistakes repeat for predictable reasons.
Positioning defines what you stand for, and messaging determines how clearly that comes across.
Mix them up, and you’ll waste time polishing words without sharpening meaning.
Get them right, and everything else becomes easier.
If you’re a founder or leadership team:
The goal is to be unmistakably clear. Decide what you stand for first and the right words will follow.
You’ve got an idea for a LinkedIn post, maybe a thought-provoking take, company update, or personal lesson.
Many founders start by listing product features without explaining why it matters. That misses the point entirely.
Startups often think crowded markets are unwinnable. If there are already ten competitors, how could you possibly break through?