Centralising wisely for clarity and efficiency
Startups thrive on speed and autonomy, but as headcount rises, so does complexity.
Set up your first scheme, cut operational risk and keep your equity setup working as you scale.
CFO / FDStay audit-ready at every stageBoard-ready equity governance and reporting, with deed / witness signatures and custom document templates.
HR / People leadTurn equity into retentionMake equity visible to employees and turn it into a real retention lever.
InvestorAccess private markets with confidenceSPVs, PISCES and private-markets access, with data rooms and deal track records.
A short walkthrough, end to end.
Migrate to VestdDigitise or move your existing scheme
EMI, growth shares, CSOP & more
ValuationsUK HMRC & US 409A valuations
Equity management & adminGovernance, admin & filings
Fundraising - InVestd RaiseApply for S/EIS & structure your round
PISCES / secondary marketsDeploy into regulated secondary trading
Fundraising, share schemes & incorporation
For scaleups & SMEsBuild and retain a winning team
For larger companiesStreamline equity management
2 min read
Graham Charlton
:
Updated on October 14, 2025
You’ve got an idea for a LinkedIn post, maybe a thought-provoking take, company update, or personal lesson.
Who should hit publish? You, the founder, or someone from the marketing team?
It’s not a trivial choice. The voice you use, whether founder or brand, shapes how people perceive your company, your culture, and your credibility.
This post will help you understand when to use your founder voice versus the company voice, and how to keep your company voice consistent even with multiple contributors.
Many growing companies get this wrong. Founders assume they have to write everything, while marketing teams sometimes over-polish and lose the human edge.
The result can make the brand seem robotic, or the founder sound like a one-person marketing department.
The founder’s voice defines early-stage identity — but brand consistency sustains it. The sweet spot is collaboration.
The founder’s authenticity builds connection and the marketing team’s structure builds clarity. Used together, they reinforce trust and scale your story.
Each voice has a role to play and knowing when to use which is key.
Founder voice
This is best for posts outlining the company vision, lessons learned, and personal reflections
It helps to build trust and relatability, though there’s a risk it can become too informal, and may need some editing.
Marketing (brand) voice
This is the best option for company updates, campaigns, and product news, as the tone becomes consistent and scalable
However it can feel distant and too formal if not balanced with a human touch
Your goal isn’t to choose one. It’s to blend them so the company feels personal, and the founder feels aligned.
The simplest way to decide who should write (and post) on LinkedIn is to work through four questions:
The best approach is often a blend.
Let the founder bring personality and insight, while the marketing team can handle structure, polish, and alignment.
That way, every post sounds human and still reflects the company’s values.
You don’t have to choose between raw founder posts and polished brand copy. The best content usually blends both:
Think of it as a creative direction. The founder sets the emotion; marketing refines the delivery.
The best founders know when to speak directly and when to let their marketing team amplify.
The founder voice builds connection, while the marketing voice builds coherence. You need both to grow trust and credibility.
Clarity here matters more than creativity. People are interested in people they trust, they don’t need too much brand polish.
Vestd helps founders align people around long-term value with employee share schemes that reinforce ownership. Learn more.
Startups thrive on speed and autonomy, but as headcount rises, so does complexity.
Employee share schemes are designed to reward individuals for helping to build a company, but what happens when an employee decides to move on?
"You are not serious people".