Unlocking efficiency: the digital revolution in HR and beyond
Last updated: 1 October 2024. Digitisation. Digital revolution. The digital age. Most of us have read or heard these words so many times that...
Manage your equity and shareholders
Share schemes & options
Fundraising
Equity management
Start a business
Company valuations
Launch funds, evalute deals & invest
Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV)
Manage your portfolio
Model future scenarios
Powerful tools and five-star support
Employee share schemes
Predictable pricing and no hidden charges
For startups
For scaleups & SMEs
For larger companies
Ideas, insight and tools to help you grow
The best hires aren’t always the ones with the most impressive CVs.
That’s because credentials don’t always translate to capability. And privilege isn’t the same as potential.
If you want to build a resilient, adaptable, high-performing team, you need to look past polished LinkedIn profiles and ask what this person could become.
In this article, we’ll look into the hidden risks of hiring for pedigree, and what hiring for potential actually looks like.
Hiring for pedigree can be a trap disguised as a shortcut.
It feels safe to hire someone from a known brand or a top-tier university.
You assume they’ve been vetted already, and that they’ve got the right stuff.
But here’s what you’re really doing when you rely too much on background:
“When companies hire for pedigree, they’re often hiring for conformity, not creativity.” - Joelle Emerson
What’s more, studies show that traditional markers of prestige aren’t strong predictors of job performance.
One large-scale analysis from the Harvard Business Review found that ‘past success in a different context is only weakly correlated with success in a new one’.
Hiring for potential means focusing less on what someone has done and more on what they could do.
It’s about spotting:
This doesn’t mean lowering the bar. You still want high standards, but the metric isn’t pedigree, it’s progress, potential, and mindset.
When you hire for potential, you’re betting on transferable qualities that power long-term success.
Here are the big four to focus on:
People who ask questions, seek feedback, and love to learn will keep evolving, even if they start with gaps in their CV.
Can they handle uncertainty? Switch gears? Stay calm when things shift? These are core traits in any fast-moving business.
Coined by psychologist Carol Dweck, this means believing skills can be developed and are not fixed.
Look for those who embrace challenges, not avoid them.
Angela Duckworth defines this as perseverance and passion for long-term goals. It’s a better predictor of success than IQ or background alone.
“Talent counts. But effort counts twice.” - Angela Duckworth, Grit
If you’re not using credentials as a shortcut, you need a structured way to spot high-potential hires. Here’s what works:
Ask about how candidates handled past situations that required adaptability, learning, or resilience.
For example: “Tell me about a time you had to solve a problem without clear guidance.”
Set real-world challenges relevant to the role, not just theoretical tests.
According to TestGorilla, employers who use skills-based hiring are 60% more likely to hire successfully
People who share your mission are more likely to bring energy, creativity, and loyalty regardless of background.
Try sharing your values in advance and asking how candidates connect with them.
Give feedback during the process and see how they respond.
Are they defensive? Curious? Adaptable?
Hiring for potential isn’t just a feel-good strategy. It has tangible benefits for performance, retention, and culture.
You’ll build teams that are:
When hiring for potential, you get to shape talent, not just inherit it. You get team members who stretch into roles, rather than settling in.
“Most people are hired for what they’ve done but succeed because of who they are becoming.” - Laszlo Bock, former SVP of People Operations at Google
The idea that someone’s background or degree defines their value is outdated and in today’s economy, it’s counterproductive.
Here’s what the evidence (and experience) tells us:
Education and employer brand aren’t reliable indicators of future success. A US OPM study showed only modest correlation between education and job performance.
Attributes like grit, learning orientation, and adaptability are among the most consistent predictors of performance across industries.
LinkedIn reports that 89% of hiring failures stem from attitude, not skills.
These traits are invisible on CVs but powerful in real-world performance.
When you expand access, you increase representation, and the results follow.
BCG found that diverse leadership teams generate 19% higher innovation revenue.
Employees hired for their trajectory, not just their track record, tend to stick around, grow, and give more.
They bring energy to the business because they see room to grow.
This isn’t just theory. Some of the best-known companies actively hire for potential over pedigree:
Next time you’re hiring, pause before filtering by CV prestige or big brand experience.
Instead, ask if this person could grow in my organisation.
Hire for what’s possible, not just what’s already polished. That’s how you build a team that outperforms and outlasts the competition.
Last updated: 1 October 2024. Digitisation. Digital revolution. The digital age. Most of us have read or heard these words so many times that...
All is not well in the employment landscape. The persistent twin challenges of recruitment and retention are casting a long shadow over business of...
Career breaks. Job hopping. A zig-zagging path across industries.