Striking the balance: how to hire for both technical and cultural fit
Hiring for technical skill or cultural alignment shouldn’t be a binary choice.
Manage your equity and shareholders
Share schemes & options
Fundraising
Equity management
Start a business
Company valuations
Launch funds, evalute deals & invest
Special Purpose Vehicles (SPV)
Manage your portfolio
Model future scenarios
Powerful tools and five-star support
Employee share schemes
Predictable pricing and no hidden charges
For startups
For scaleups & SMEs
For larger companies
Ideas, insight and tools to help you grow
Hiring is always a gamble, but some gambles are more expensive than others.
A bad hire can be a waste of salary, as well as a drain on team morale, productivity, and momentum.
A CareerBuilder survey found that 74% of companies admit to hiring the wrong person, with each bad hire costing an average of nearly $15,000.
The earlier you catch it, the less costly it becomes. Spotting the warning signs in the first 90 days can mean the difference between a manageable reset and a spiralling expense.
In this article, we’ll break down a practical framework you can use to identify, address, and, if necessary, end a bad hire before the damage spreads.
Not every slow starter is a bad hire. Some people simply need time, structure, or support.
A bad hire is different. It’s someone who is misaligned in ways that can’t be fixed by onboarding or coaching.
A true bad hire typically shows three or more of these patterns:
Performance issues can often be solved. A bad hire is about deeper misalignment that training won’t fix.
The probation period exists for a reason. Most bad hires reveal themselves early if you know what to look for.
Warning signs include:
Research from Leadership IQ found that 46% of new hires fail within 18 months, most due to attitude and cultural fit rather than skills.
The first 90 days are your best window to spot and address a bad hire before they embed.
One of the biggest reasons leaders misjudge performance is that expectations aren’t crystal clear.
If your only guide is a job description, you’re already behind.
A role charter sets out:
“The number one driver of employee engagement is whether or not they can answer ‘yes’ to the question: I know what is expected of me at work.” - Gallup
If you haven’t set clear expectations, you can’t fairly judge whether someone is failing.
Before pulling the trigger on an exit, you need to know whether the issues are fixable.
A SHRM study found that 95% of hiring professionals say a bad hire impacts team morale, and 80% say it lowers productivity. Those are fatal flaws worth addressing quickly.
“Not every problem is a firing problem. But some problems only get worse the longer you wait.” - Patty McCord, Netflix’s former Chief Talent Officer
Dragging out a bad hire is the most common mistake leaders make. It feels easier to give hires one more month, but each month compounds the cost.
Best practice:
For example, when Zappos offered new hires $2,000 to quit after training, they did it to weed out bad fits as quickly as possible. That clarity saved them far more than it cost.
Quick, fair decisions minimise the damage and also show your team you won’t tolerate dead weight.
Every company makes hiring mistakes. The difference between a costly one and a manageable one is speed and clarity.
By setting expectations with role charters, monitoring the first 90 days, and separating coachable gaps from fatal flaws, you can catch a bad hire before they become a long-term liability.
Clarity protects your culture, your budget, and your team’s energy.
Don’t wait for the damage to show. Spot the signs early and act.
Build a more aligned, motivated team with Vestd.
From equity schemes to smarter role design, we help founders and leaders create companies where people do their best work.
Hiring for technical skill or cultural alignment shouldn’t be a binary choice.
You may think your hiring process is thorough, but candidates might see it as a red flag.
Hiring the wrong person isn’t just a headache. It’s a costly mistake, and not just in terms of salary. The ripple effects of a bad hire can hurt...