How to run meetings that waste less time and get more done.
Most meetings aren’t broken, just badly designed.
We’ve all sat in sessions that go nowhere. No clear purpose, no decisions, just a slow drift from topic to topic while people silently check their email.
The average employee attends 62 meetings a month, and considers more than half of them a waste of time.
Meetings can work though. When structured well, they build alignment, drive accountability, and move projects forward.
The problem is that most teams are never taught how to run a good one.
This article breaks down the anatomy of an effective meeting, and what it takes to make them useful, efficient, and energising.
We’ll look at the four essential components every meeting needs, and how to structure your meetings to drive outcomes.
Time is your most valuable resource, and meetings are one of the easiest ways to waste it. According to Harvard Business Review, 71% of senior managers say meetings are unproductive and inefficient.
Beyond lost hours, bad meetings cost you:
And at scale, the costs are eye-watering. A UK-based company with 100 employees could easily waste £250,000+ a year in time lost to ineffective meetings.
“Too many meetings are simply the default response to uncertainty. Instead of clarifying what needs to happen, we schedule time to talk about it.” - Adam Grant, organisational psychologist
First of all, consider whether this needs to be a meeting at all. Getting rid of pointless meetings immediately saves time and boosts productivity.
A good meeting starts before anyone joins the call. Without a clear agenda, you’re inviting people to show up unprepared or disengaged.
A good agenda includes:
Sharing the agenda at least 24 hours in advance gives people a chance to think and keeps the conversation focused once it starts.
Also, if you can't write a one-sentence purpose for the meeting, don’t hold it.
A tight, well-facilitated meeting respects everyone’s calendar and cognitive bandwidth. That means setting clear start and end times, and sticking to them.
Timeboxing isn’t about rushing. It’s about focus. When people know they have 10 minutes to debate an issue, not 30, they get to the point faster.
Try this format for a 30-minute meeting:
Running late? Drop low-priority items or suggest a follow-up, not a spill-over.
Another idea is to move away from the default 30/60 minute meeting slots. Make them 25 or 50 minute meetings instead, you probably don’t need the extra time.
The best meetings aren’t just free-for-alls, they have structure.
Assigning clear roles keeps things moving and avoids groupthink or ambiguity.
Key roles to assign (even informally):
Rotating these roles weekly or monthly can prevent burnout and encourage engagement.
“Assigning a facilitator isn’t bureaucracy, it’s a productivity multiplier. It turns meetings from passive to purposeful.”
— Priya Parker, author of The Art of Gathering
The true test of a meeting isn’t how many people spoke, it’s what happens next.
Wrap every meeting with a quick recap of:
Even better, share a short summary in writing within the hour.
A meeting without clear outcomes is just a conversation. You’re not paying your team to talk, but to move things forward.
“The most effective meetings end with clear decisions and clear ownership of next steps.” - Steven G. Rogelberg, author of The Surprising Science of Meetings
Bad meetings aren’t just annoying, they’re expensive. And often, they’re a sign of deeper problems such as a lack of clear goals, roles, or leadership.
The fix isn’t more meetings, it’s better ones.
Structure drives success. When every meeting has a purpose, a plan, and a clear end point, people show up ready and leave knowing exactly what to do next.
-
And if you want to really get the team invested in your company's success, you know who to call! A share scheme does wonders for alignment. But don't just take our word for it; hear from our customers.