Welcome to Vestd's blog

Pay benchmarking tools that won’t break the bank

Written by Graham Charlton | 25 September 2025

Pay benchmarking helps you set fair, competitive salaries. It can help you to attract talent, prevent costly turnover, and build trust inside your team. 

Done badly, or not at all, it can lead to guesswork, pay gaps, and discontent.

The challenge is that benchmarking tools can be expensive and overwhelming, especially for growing companies that lack big HR budgets. 

In this article, we’ll explore the best practical options for pay benchmarking, including salary databases, HR platforms, and industry-specific resources. 

Why benchmarking matters

Fair pay isn’t just about compliance or keeping up with the market. It’s about culture. 

When employees suspect they’re underpaid compared to peers, this negatively impacts trust, engagement, and retention.

The costs of turnover are significant. Research from SHRM estimates that replacing an employee costs, on average, the equivalent of six to nine months of their salary. 

Pay benchmarking is a way to avoid these costs while staying competitive against larger firms. It protects your runway, helps you retain key people, and signals fairness inside the business.

A smart benchmarking approach balances cost, accuracy, and context.

1. Salary databases

Salary databases are often the first stop for startups because they’re quick, easy, and cheap to access. Platforms like Payscale, Glassdoor, and Levels.fyi are widely used because they let you see what people in similar roles are earning, often broken down by geography, company size, or level of experience.

They’re great for early-stage companies who just need to check whether their offers are broadly competitive. 

For example, if you’re about to hire your first engineer, Levels.fyi can show you how compensation is structured at tech companies. 

Glassdoor provides rough averages across industries, while Payscale lets you filter by location and years of experience.

Pros:

  • Affordable (some are free or low-cost)
  • Easy to access and use
  • Good for getting a quick market snapshot

Cons:

  • Self-reported data can be patchy or inflated
  • Coverage may be limited outside major industries or geographies
  • Data may lag behind fast-changing markets

These tools are best for early-stage startups or SMEs who need a baseline view of salaries before making offers.

2. Specialist HR platforms

As a company grows, simple salary databases may no longer cut it. That’s where specialist HR platforms with benchmarking features come in. 

Tools like Pave and Figures are designed for startups and scaleups that want to benchmark pay more rigorously.

These platforms offer fresher, more structured data than free databases because they often collect verified information from participating companies. 

Many also integrate with HRIS and payroll systems, so you can benchmark against the market in real time rather than relying on one-off searches.

Pros:

  • Data is fresher and more structured
  • Often integrates with HRIS/payroll systems for live updates
  • Includes equity benchmarking alongside salaries

Cons:

  • More expensive than standalone databases
  • May require you to share your own data to get access
  • Feature sets can be overkill for very small teams

These tools are best for growing startups or scaleups that need to professionalise pay benchmarking. 

3. Industry surveys and peer networks

Sometimes the most useful benchmarking data doesn’t come from software at all. Industry-specific surveys and peer networks can provide context and nuance that global platforms miss.

Professional associations like the CIPD run annual reward and pay surveys, while specialist bodies such as the PRCA or BCS publish reports tailored to their industries. 

Peer networks, whether Slack groups, founder communities, or local HR roundtables, can also offer anecdotal but highly relevant insights into what similar companies are paying.

The strength of this approach is context. If you’re in a niche industry, a peer network can help you understand real-world challenges like how startups in your sector are structuring pay for hard-to-fill roles. 

The trade-off is that surveys can be expensive or infrequent, and peer data isn’t always verified. But when combined with other tools, these insights can help you make smarter decisions.

Pros:

  • Highly tailored to industry or niche
  • Provides context global databases may lack
  • Peer sharing builds relationships as well as insights

Cons:

  • Surveys may be expensive or only updated annually
  • Peer data can be anecdotal or unverified
  • Coverage varies widely by sector

These approaches are best for SMEs in niche industries where context matters more than broad averages.

How to choose the right tool

The best approach depends on your stage, size, and hiring needs. Think of it as a progression:

  • Pre-seed/seed stage. Start with free or low-cost salary databases like Glassdoor or Levels.fyi to get directional insight.
  • Growth stage. Invest in specialist HR platforms to get fresher data and combine salary with equity benchmarking.
  • Niche sectors (any size). Supplement with industry surveys or peer networks to add the context that generic platforms can’t provide.

In short, start lean with accessible tools, add structure and depth as you scale, and layer in industry-specific insights when context becomes critical.

Summary

Pay benchmarking doesn’t have to drain your budget. The key is to find the best tool for each stage of your growth. 

Start with what you can afford, layer in more robust tools as you grow, and always focus on fairness and transparency.

Vestd specialises in employee share schemes that align founders, leaders, and teams for the long run. Find out more here.