There is no single ESOP pool percentage that works for every startup.
You may hear founders, investors or advisors talk about setting aside 5%, 10%, 15% or even 20% of the company's equity for employees. These figures can be useful as reference points, but they should not replace an actual calculation based on your hiring plans, existing grants, funding plans and the roles you expect to hire.
For an Indian startup, the better question is not “What percentage do other startups use?”
It is:
“How much equity will we realistically need to allocate to employees over the next few years?”
That distinction matters because an ESOP pool that is too small can leave you repeatedly revisiting your equity structure, while a pool that is unnecessarily large can affect ownership modelling and future fundraising discussions.
An ESOP pool is a portion of a company's equity that is reserved for employee stock options and other eligible employee equity incentives under the company's scheme.
The pool provides the company with equity that can be allocated to employees over time rather than deciding the entire employee equity programme one grant at a time.
For example, imagine an early-stage company has 900,000 shares and decides to reserve 100,000 shares for its employee ESOP pool.
The pool represents 10% of the total 1,000,000 shares after including the reserved pool in the ownership model.
The exact structure and treatment of an ESOP pool will depend on how the company has structured its share capital and scheme, so the percentage should always be considered alongside the underlying cap table.
There is no mandatory percentage that every Indian startup needs to follow.
|
10–20%
Benchmark, not a rule
|
A commonly discussed range for startup employee option pools. A five-person startup hiring its first senior leadership team may have very different equity requirements from a 200-person company that has already made substantial employee grants. |
The right pool size depends on factors such as:
| ✓How many people you expect to hire | ✓Which seniority levels you are hiring for |
| ✓Whether you need equity to attract senior or specialist talent | ✓How much equity has already been granted |
| ✓How much of the existing pool remains available | ✓Your expected growth over the next 18–24 months |
| ✓Whether you expect another funding round | ✓How your proposed pool affects the wider cap table |
One of the easiest mistakes is to decide that your startup needs a 10% ESOP pool and then work backwards. Instead, start with the people you expect to hire. Suppose a Series A startup expects to hire:
| Role | Expected hires | Illustrative equity requirement |
| Senior leadership | 3 | Higher individual grants |
| Engineering | 15 | Moderate grants |
| Product and design | 6 | Moderate grants |
| Sales and business development | 10 | Smaller individual grants |
| Other functions | 6 | Smaller individual grants |
The company can then estimate the equity required for each hiring group and model the total requirement.
The numbers will vary considerably between companies. A technical deep-tech startup recruiting specialist scientists, for example, may have very different equity requirements from a consumer startup hiring a large sales team.
This is why copying another company's ESOP percentage can be misleading.
Your ESOP pool is not just for today's employees.
It should be considered in the context of your expected hiring plan.
Ask:
Who will we need to hire over the next 18–24 months?
Then consider:
For example, a startup with a 12-person team may not need a large pool simply because another startup of a similar valuation has one. If the company expects to remain relatively lean, its equity requirements may be much lower.
On the other hand, a company planning to grow from 20 to 100 employees may need to reserve substantially more equity for future hiring.
The headline ESOP pool percentage does not tell the whole story.
You should also understand how much of the pool has already been:
Imagine a startup has a 10% ESOP pool.
It has already granted options representing 7% of the company's equity.
On paper, the company still has a 10% pool. But only 3% remains available for new grants, assuming the scheme and cap table treat those figures on the same basis.
That distinction becomes increasingly important as the company grows.
An ESOP pool is not the same thing as equity already owned by employees.
The pool represents equity reserved for the employee incentive programme. Individual employees may receive grants from that pool over time, subject to the company's scheme terms.
For example:
Company equity → ESOP pool → employee grants → vesting → exercise
An employee who receives an ESOP grant does not necessarily own the underlying shares immediately. The rights attached to the grant depend on the scheme and grant terms.
This distinction is particularly important when founders and investors are modelling ownership.
Creating or increasing an ESOP pool changes the ownership model because equity is being reserved for future employee participation.
Consider a simplified example.
A startup has 1,000,000 shares before creating an ESOP pool.
The founders collectively own all 1,000,000 shares.
The company then creates a pool of 100,000 shares.
The founders still hold their original 1,000,000 shares, but their percentage ownership is now calculated against the larger share base represented in the model.
This is why founders should model the ESOP pool alongside the rest of the cap table rather than treating it as a separate HR decision.
The impact can become even more important when a funding round is being planned.
An ESOP pool does not exist in isolation from your fundraising plans.
Investors will typically want to understand:
The treatment of the pool can affect the resulting ownership percentages for existing shareholders and the incoming investor.
This is one reason founders should model their employee equity requirements before finalising investment terms rather than discovering halfway through negotiations that the company needs additional pool capacity.
It can be tempting to create a large ESOP pool early and assume that having more equity available will make future hiring easier.
But unused equity still forms part of your ownership model.
If your hiring plan suggests that you need capacity for a particular number of future grants, creating substantially more capacity than necessary may not provide an immediate benefit.
There is also another consideration: the value of the equity matters, not just the percentage.
A 0.5% grant in a very early-stage company and a 0.5% grant in a much larger company can represent very different economic propositions.
Your compensation strategy should therefore consider the company's stage, valuation, role, seniority, expected contribution and the potential future value of the equity.
Instead of starting with a percentage, work through four stages.
| 1 |
Map your current equity position Start with your current cap table. Understand: Founder ownership Investor ownership Existing ESOP pool Grants already made Unallocated pool Convertible securities or other instruments that may affect future ownership
|
| 2 |
Map your hiring requirements List the roles you expect to hire over the next 18–24 months. Group them by seniority and function rather than trying to predict the exact grant for every future employee. |
| 3 |
Estimate future equity requirements Use your expected hiring plan and proposed grant ranges to estimate how much equity you may need. Leave some capacity for hiring plans that change. Startup hiring rarely follows the original plan perfectly. |
| 4 |
Model the result against your cap table Once you have an estimated requirement, model how the pool affects current and future ownership. If you are preparing for a funding round, model the pool alongside the proposed investment rather than considering the two separately. |
A 10–20% range can be useful as a starting reference, particularly when comparing how employee equity is commonly structured in startups.
But it should not become the answer to the question.
For one company, 5% may provide sufficient capacity for its expected hiring plan.
Another company may need more because it expects to make significant senior hires and grow rapidly.
The important question is whether your pool is defensible against your actual hiring and equity strategy.
If an investor asks why your company has a 12% pool rather than 10%, you should be able to explain the number through your hiring plan, existing grants and expected future requirements.
That is a much stronger position than saying, “10% is what other startups use.”
Managing the ESOP pool becomes more complicated as your company grows and more grants are issued.
Vestd India brings your ESOPs and wider equity records into one centralised platform, so you can keep track of the pool alongside grants, vesting, exercises and your cap table.
Teams can manage employee grants, maintain equity records, store signed documentation and view current and forecast grant values. Bulk uploads, reporting and dashboards can also reduce the amount of manual work involved in maintaining equity records as the company scales.
For founders and finance teams, the benefit is not simply knowing the headline ESOP percentage. It is having a clearer view of how much of the pool has been allocated, what remains available and how employee equity fits into the wider ownership structure.
Plan the pool around the business you are building, not the percentage another startup happens to use.
Book a demo with Vestd India →